The study design indicates that the Concomitant Medication (CM) log form should only appear if it was indicated that the participant if on medication. Viedoc does not support this. An edit check will instead be implemented to trigger if a CM is unecessarily filled out.
Impact: Data collection structure will not work as designed, potentially having a surplus of empty and unnecessary CM forms.
The study design indicates that the Concomitant Medication (CM) log form should only appear if it was indicated that the participant if on medication. Viedoc does not support this. An edit check will instead be implemented to trigger if a CM is unecessarily filled out.
Impact: Data collection structure will not work as designed, potentially having a surplus of empty and unnecessary CM forms.
The study design specifies that the “Data Capturer” role should not be able to add or remove participants. Please note that all permissions in the study build specification will be applied according to Viedoc’s default role settings.
Impact: Users assigned to this role will not have the intended permissions, potentially causing security or workflow issues.
Current edit checks use generic syntax that needs to be converted to Viedoc's specific edit check language.
Impact: Data validation rules will not function, potentially allowing invalid data entry.
Field names contain special characters and spaces which are not allowed in Viedoc's naming system.
Impact: Forms cannot be deployed with current field names, requiring renaming of multiple fields.
The Study design indicates that one or more forms should be optional at a visit. Viedoc does not support this. We recommend adding a section to X form where the data capturer will select which additional forms should appear in the visit folder
Impact: Data collection structure will not work as designed, potentially having a surplus of empty and unecessary optional CRFs.
Current edit checks use generic syntax that needs to be converted to Viedoc's specific edit check language.
Impact: Data validation rules will not function, potentially allowing invalid data entry.
The study design indicates that a visit's folder should only open once the previous visit is completed and documented. An edit check will instead be implemented to trigger if a visit is initiated before the previous visit has been documented.
Impact: Data collection structure will not work as designed, potentially having a surplus of empty/unnecessary/erroneous CRFs.
The study design includes repeating forms for Concomitant Medications and Adverse Events within visit folders, but Viedoc requires repeating groups instead of repeating forms.
Impact: Data collection structure will not work as designed, potentially missing multiple medication or AE entries per visit.
The study design includes repeating forms for Concomitant Medications and Adverse Events within visit folders, but Viedoc requires repeating groups instead of repeating forms.
Impact: Data collection structure will not work as designed, potentially missing multiple medication or AE entries per visit.
Date fields use DD/MM/YYYY format but OpenClinica expects MM/DD/YYYY for validation rules.
Impact: Date validation will fail, allowing invalid dates or preventing valid date entry.
The Study design indicates that one or more forms should be optional at a visit. Viedoc does not support this. We recommend adding a section to X form where the data capturer will select which additional forms should appear in the visit folder
Impact: Data collection structure will not work as designed, potentially having a surplus of empty and unecessary optional CRFs.
Field names contain special characters and spaces which are not allowed in Viedoc's naming system.
Impact: Forms cannot be deployed with current field names, requiring renaming of multiple fields.